From dprideout at gmail.com  Thu Oct 11 17:56:37 2007
From: dprideout at gmail.com (David Rideout)
Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2007 18:56:37 -0400
Subject: [Users] Fortran module dependencies
Message-ID: <1ce81abb0710111556hc7ab5a0k1da5220b05752859@mail.gmail.com>

How does one 'properly' use a module which is defined in another
thorn?  I followed FAQ 6 but still get warnings:

Warning: While tracing module dependencies: Source file for module
"lapack" not found
   Searched in thorn directory only.

Thanks,
David

From tradke at aei.mpg.de  Fri Oct 12 05:12:57 2007
From: tradke at aei.mpg.de (Thomas Radke)
Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2007 12:12:57 +0200
Subject: [Users] Fortran module dependencies
In-Reply-To: <1ce81abb0710111556hc7ab5a0k1da5220b05752859@mail.gmail.com>
References: <1ce81abb0710111556hc7ab5a0k1da5220b05752859@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <470F48A9.1090803@aei.mpg.de>

David Rideout wrote:
> How does one 'properly' use a module which is defined in another
> thorn?  I followed FAQ 6 but still get warnings:
> 
> Warning: While tracing module dependencies: Source file for module
> "lapack" not found
>    Searched in thorn directory only.

Hi David,

how does your make.configurations.deps file look like ?

-- 
Cheers, Thomas.

From dprideout at gmail.com  Fri Oct 12 09:40:44 2007
From: dprideout at gmail.com (David Rideout)
Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2007 10:40:44 -0400
Subject: [Users] Fortran module dependencies
In-Reply-To: <470F48A9.1090803@aei.mpg.de>
References: <1ce81abb0710111556hc7ab5a0k1da5220b05752859@mail.gmail.com>
	<470F48A9.1090803@aei.mpg.de>
Message-ID: <1ce81abb0710120740p30008fd4id6c7628306d2bcd1@mail.gmail.com>

My make.code.deps is as follows.  Is that the same as make.configuration.deps?

Thanks,
David

#StrongPositivity.F90.o:	../../../CactusExamples/LAPACK/src/lapack.F90.o
#StrongPositivity.F90.o:	lapack.mod

#lapack.mod: $(CCTK_LIBDIR)/../build/LAPACK/lapack.f90
#	pwd

ifneq (,$(findstring ArrangementA/ThornA,$(THORNS)))
$(CCTK_LIBDIR)$(DIRSEP)libQMTBase.a : $(CCTK_LIBDIR)$(DIRSEP)libLAPACK.a
endif


On 10/12/07, Thomas Radke <tradke at aei.mpg.de> wrote:
> David Rideout wrote:
> > How does one 'properly' use a module which is defined in another
> > thorn?  I followed FAQ 6 but still get warnings:
> >
> > Warning: While tracing module dependencies: Source file for module
> > "lapack" not found
> >    Searched in thorn directory only.
>
> Hi David,
>
> how does your make.configurations.deps file look like ?
>
> --
> Cheers, Thomas.
> _______________________________________________
> Users mailing list
> Users at cactuscode.org
> http://www.cactuscode.org/mailman/listinfo/users
>

From tradke at aei.mpg.de  Fri Oct 12 09:53:23 2007
From: tradke at aei.mpg.de (Thomas Radke)
Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2007 16:53:23 +0200
Subject: [Users] Fortran module dependencies
In-Reply-To: <1ce81abb0710120740p30008fd4id6c7628306d2bcd1@mail.gmail.com>
References: <1ce81abb0710111556hc7ab5a0k1da5220b05752859@mail.gmail.com>	<470F48A9.1090803@aei.mpg.de>
	<1ce81abb0710120740p30008fd4id6c7628306d2bcd1@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <470F8A63.9000001@aei.mpg.de>

David Rideout wrote:
> My make.code.deps is as follows.  Is that the same as make.configuration.deps?

No, apparently not, it's included somewhere else. I'm not sure either 
why there are these two makefile dependency files.
Try putting your dependency rule in a make.configurations.deps file.

> ifneq (,$(findstring ArrangementA/ThornA,$(THORNS)))
> $(CCTK_LIBDIR)$(DIRSEP)libQMTBase.a : $(CCTK_LIBDIR)$(DIRSEP)libLAPACK.a
> endif

It seems you forgot to substitute 'ArrangementA/ThornA' with the 
appropriate arrangement/thorn name of yours.

-- 
Cheers, Thomas.

From goodale at cct.lsu.edu  Fri Oct 12 09:54:52 2007
From: goodale at cct.lsu.edu (Tom Goodale)
Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2007 15:54:52 +0100 (BST)
Subject: [Users] Fortran module dependencies
In-Reply-To: <470F8A63.9000001@aei.mpg.de>
References: <1ce81abb0710111556hc7ab5a0k1da5220b05752859@mail.gmail.com>
	<470F48A9.1090803@aei.mpg.de>
	<1ce81abb0710120740p30008fd4id6c7628306d2bcd1@mail.gmail.com>
	<470F8A63.9000001@aei.mpg.de>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0710121552170.10317@fandango.dyndns.org>

On Fri, 12 Oct 2007, Thomas Radke wrote:

> David Rideout wrote:
>> My make.code.deps is as follows.  Is that the same as make.configuration.deps?
>
> No, apparently not, it's included somewhere else. I'm not sure either
> why there are these two makefile dependency files.
> Try putting your dependency rule in a make.configurations.deps file.

One is for dependencies of files within your thorn or for custom rules to 
make things in your thorn,  the other is for things which affect a 
confuguration as a whole.

Tom

From dprideout at gmail.com  Fri Oct 12 10:46:55 2007
From: dprideout at gmail.com (David Rideout)
Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2007 11:46:55 -0400
Subject: [Users] Fortran module dependencies
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0710121552170.10317@fandango.dyndns.org>
References: <1ce81abb0710111556hc7ab5a0k1da5220b05752859@mail.gmail.com>
	<470F48A9.1090803@aei.mpg.de>
	<1ce81abb0710120740p30008fd4id6c7628306d2bcd1@mail.gmail.com>
	<470F8A63.9000001@aei.mpg.de>
	<Pine.LNX.4.64.0710121552170.10317@fandango.dyndns.org>
Message-ID: <1ce81abb0710120846i135f7636k4818781a062b1d8d@mail.gmail.com>

I see, thanks.  Grepping for make.configuration.deps in the UsersGuide
yields nothing...  Any takers?

Cheers,
David

On 10/12/07, Tom Goodale <goodale at cct.lsu.edu> wrote:
> On Fri, 12 Oct 2007, Thomas Radke wrote:
>
> > David Rideout wrote:
> >> My make.code.deps is as follows.  Is that the same as make.configuration.deps?
> >
> > No, apparently not, it's included somewhere else. I'm not sure either
> > why there are these two makefile dependency files.
> > Try putting your dependency rule in a make.configurations.deps file.
>
> One is for dependencies of files within your thorn or for custom rules to
> make things in your thorn,  the other is for things which affect a
> confuguration as a whole.
>
> Tom
> _______________________________________________
> Users mailing list
> Users at cactuscode.org
> http://www.cactuscode.org/mailman/listinfo/users
>

From dprideout at gmail.com  Fri Oct 12 13:44:38 2007
From: dprideout at gmail.com (David Rideout)
Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2007 14:44:38 -0400
Subject: [Users] Fortran module dependencies
In-Reply-To: <470F8A63.9000001@aei.mpg.de>
References: <1ce81abb0710111556hc7ab5a0k1da5220b05752859@mail.gmail.com>
	<470F48A9.1090803@aei.mpg.de>
	<1ce81abb0710120740p30008fd4id6c7628306d2bcd1@mail.gmail.com>
	<470F8A63.9000001@aei.mpg.de>
Message-ID: <1ce81abb0710121144t2e0b6e81q75c23bdaac1fb932@mail.gmail.com>

Ok, I took this out of make.code.deps and put

ifneq (,$(findstring CactusExternal/LAPACK,$(THORNS)))
$(CCTK_LIBDIR)$(DIRSEP)libQMTBase.a : $(CCTK_LIBDIR)$(DIRSEP)libLAPACK.a
endif

in make.configuration.deps.  I still get the same warning.

-David


On 10/12/07, Thomas Radke <tradke at aei.mpg.de> wrote:
> David Rideout wrote:
> > My make.code.deps is as follows.  Is that the same as make.configuration.deps?
>
> No, apparently not, it's included somewhere else. I'm not sure either
> why there are these two makefile dependency files.
> Try putting your dependency rule in a make.configurations.deps file.
>
> > ifneq (,$(findstring ArrangementA/ThornA,$(THORNS)))
> > $(CCTK_LIBDIR)$(DIRSEP)libQMTBase.a : $(CCTK_LIBDIR)$(DIRSEP)libLAPACK.a
> > endif
>
> It seems you forgot to substitute 'ArrangementA/ThornA' with the
> appropriate arrangement/thorn name of yours.
>
> --
> Cheers, Thomas.
> _______________________________________________
> Users mailing list
> Users at cactuscode.org
> http://www.cactuscode.org/mailman/listinfo/users
>

From schnetter at cct.lsu.edu  Fri Oct 12 21:10:32 2007
From: schnetter at cct.lsu.edu (Erik Schnetter)
Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2007 19:10:32 -0700
Subject: [Users] Fortran module dependencies
In-Reply-To: <1ce81abb0710111556hc7ab5a0k1da5220b05752859@mail.gmail.com>
References: <1ce81abb0710111556hc7ab5a0k1da5220b05752859@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <27685319-098E-4A37-A4E8-464D28AFA027@cct.lsu.edu>

On Oct 11, 2007, at 15:56:37, David Rideout wrote:

> How does one 'properly' use a module which is defined in another
> thorn?  I followed FAQ 6 but still get warnings:
>
> Warning: While tracing module dependencies: Source file for module
> "lapack" not found
>    Searched in thorn directory only.

The thorn which contains the module needs to provide a capability,  
and the thorn which uses the module needs to require that  
capability.  You can use the module name as the name of the  
capability.  This is declared in the file configuration.ccl.  Cactus  
then automatically handles the thorn dependencies, i.e., it chooses a  
correct compilation and link order.

The other suggested methods using the makefile fragments choose the  
correct link order, but they do not cause the dependent Fortran file  
to be recompiled if the module changes, since this dependency will be  
missed.

-erik

-- 
Erik Schnetter <schnetter at cct.lsu.edu>

My email is as private as my paper mail.  I therefore support encrypting
and signing email messages.  Get my PGP key from www.keyserver.net.



-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: PGP.sig
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 186 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://www.cactuscode.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20071012/80f17c67/attachment.bin 

From dprideout at gmail.com  Mon Oct 15 15:35:34 2007
From: dprideout at gmail.com (David Rideout)
Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2007 16:35:34 -0400
Subject: [Users] Fortran module dependencies
In-Reply-To: <27685319-098E-4A37-A4E8-464D28AFA027@cct.lsu.edu>
References: <1ce81abb0710111556hc7ab5a0k1da5220b05752859@mail.gmail.com>
	<27685319-098E-4A37-A4E8-464D28AFA027@cct.lsu.edu>
Message-ID: <1ce81abb0710151335i725298f8wcbd6db64167d49aa@mail.gmail.com>

Thanks, Erik.  FAQ 6 should be updated.

-David

On 10/12/07, Erik Schnetter <schnetter at cct.lsu.edu> wrote:
> On Oct 11, 2007, at 15:56:37, David Rideout wrote:
>
> > How does one 'properly' use a module which is defined in another
> > thorn?  I followed FAQ 6 but still get warnings:
> >
> > Warning: While tracing module dependencies: Source file for module
> > "lapack" not found
> >    Searched in thorn directory only.
>
> The thorn which contains the module needs to provide a capability,
> and the thorn which uses the module needs to require that
> capability.  You can use the module name as the name of the
> capability.  This is declared in the file configuration.ccl.  Cactus
> then automatically handles the thorn dependencies, i.e., it chooses a
> correct compilation and link order.
>
> The other suggested methods using the makefile fragments choose the
> correct link order, but they do not cause the dependent Fortran file
> to be recompiled if the module changes, since this dependency will be
> missed.
>
> -erik
>
> --
> Erik Schnetter <schnetter at cct.lsu.edu>
>
> My email is as private as my paper mail.  I therefore support encrypting
> and signing email messages.  Get my PGP key from www.keyserver.net.
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Users mailing list
> Users at cactuscode.org
> http://www.cactuscode.org/mailman/listinfo/users
>
>
>

From Lizhe.Wang at iwr.fzk.de  Wed Oct 31 09:18:44 2007
From: Lizhe.Wang at iwr.fzk.de (Wang, Lizhe)
Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2007 16:18:44 +0100
Subject: [Users] Cactus on AMD 64bit architecture
Message-ID: <53834FBAA22A7F43B76C1BCD2D5A09D301DBD09F@FZKMSX6.ka.fzk.de>

Dear all:
I want to know whether Cactus can work on AMD 64bit architecture with Suse 10?
thanks,
Lizhe


From schnetter at cct.lsu.edu  Wed Oct 31 09:23:19 2007
From: schnetter at cct.lsu.edu (Erik Schnetter)
Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2007 10:23:19 -0500
Subject: [Users] Cactus on AMD 64bit architecture
In-Reply-To: <53834FBAA22A7F43B76C1BCD2D5A09D301DBD09F@FZKMSX6.ka.fzk.de>
References: <53834FBAA22A7F43B76C1BCD2D5A09D301DBD09F@FZKMSX6.ka.fzk.de>
Message-ID: <B2E140B5-7E74-4B40-A28F-83C419C48754@cct.lsu.edu>

On Oct 31, 2007, at 10:18:44, Wang, Lizhe wrote:

> Dear all:
> I want to know whether Cactus can work on AMD 64bit architecture  
> with Suse 10?

Lizhe,

I use Cactus regularly on ADM 64-bit platforms.  I haven't used SuSE  
recently, but the particular operating system is usually not an  
issue, since Cactus is distributed as source code.

If you have a C compiler, Make, Perl etc. installed, then the WaveToy  
example should compile and run out of the box -- keep us posted if not!

-erik

-- 
Erik Schnetter <schnetter at cct.lsu.edu>

My email is as private as my paper mail.  I therefore support encrypting
and signing email messages.  Get my PGP key from www.keyserver.net.



-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: PGP.sig
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 186 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://www.cactuscode.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20071031/94ce8047/attachment.bin 

From yye00 at cct.lsu.edu  Wed Oct 31 09:38:22 2007
From: yye00 at cct.lsu.edu (Yaakoub El-Khamra)
Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2007 10:38:22 -0500
Subject: [Users] Cactus on AMD 64bit architecture
In-Reply-To: <53834FBAA22A7F43B76C1BCD2D5A09D301DBD09F@FZKMSX6.ka.fzk.de>
References: <53834FBAA22A7F43B76C1BCD2D5A09D301DBD09F@FZKMSX6.ka.fzk.de>
Message-ID: <1193845102.17692.0.camel@fmws01.cct.lsu.edu>


Cactus should work with AMD 64bit with Suse 10. I run it on an AMD64 bit
with Fedora.

Cheers
Yaakoub

On Wed, 2007-10-31 at 16:18 +0100, Wang, Lizhe wrote:
> Dear all:
> I want to know whether Cactus can work on AMD 64bit architecture with Suse 10?
> thanks,
> Lizhe
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Users mailing list
> Users at cactuscode.org
> http://www.cactuscode.org/mailman/listinfo/users
>