[Users] ADMConstraints

Luca Baiotti baiotti at aei.mpg.de
Thu May 31 03:40:48 CDT 2007


Hi Erik,

thanks for the update. Have you also thought of adding the flag
chackpoint='no' to the ADMConstraints variables? Is there any
counter-indication?

Luca


On May 31, 2007 03:58 AM, Erik Schnetter <schnetter at cct.lsu.edu> wrote:

> While calculating the constraints with ADMConstraints in the presence
> of mesh refinement works fine, there was a problem with calculating  
> norms of the constraints, which may require time interpolation.  In  
> order to do this correctly, it is necessary to keep several time  
> levels of the constraints, and to re-calculate the constraints after  
> changing the grid hierarchy. If this is not done, then the values of
> the constraints at each output grid point are correct, but norms of  
> the constraints may not be.
> 
> I updated ADMConstraints so that it supports this behaviour.  In  
> order to remain backward compatible, this behaviour cannot be the  
> default.  Obtaining correct norms for the constraints requires  
> setting the parameters
> 
> ADMConstraints::constraints_persist = yes
> ADMConstraints::constraints_timelevels = 3
> 
> where the number 3 depend on the time interpolation order; for linear
> time interpolation, you only need 2 time levels.
> 
> On the other hand, if you want to save space and time, and if you do  
> not need the norms of the constraints, then you should set the
> parameter
> 
> ADMConstraints::constraints_prolongation_type = "none"
> 
> -erik
> 
> -- 
> Erik Schnetter <schnetter at cct.lsu.edu>
> 
> My email is as private as my paper mail. I therefore support
> encrypting
> and signing email messages.  Get my PGP key from www.keyserver.net.
> 
> 
> 



More information about the Users mailing list