[Developers] MoL Scheduling

[I.Hawke]

Yosef Zlochower wrote:
>  I think that two MoL routines ( MoL_RestoreSandR,MoL_FinishLoop)
> are schedules incorrectly.
> These routines are scheduled
> "IN MoL_Evolution AFTER MoL_PostStep",
> but MoL_PostStep is not scheduled in MoL_Evolution,
> it is in the subgroup MoL_Step. Should this rather be
> "IN MoL_Evolution AFTER MoL_Step"
>
> I tried to schedule one of my routines after MoL_FinishLoop,
> and the result was that MoL_FinishLoop got scheduled before MoL_Step.
>   

I had always assumed that if B is scheduled in A and C is scheduled 
after B, then C would implicitly be scheduled after A (in the case where 
it is not explicitly scheduled in A). I cannot remember if the precise 
statement is meant to explicitly give the reason for the schedule 
dependency or is just historical. Tom, does the sorter not recognize 
this case?

Ian